The following document is required by the Pennsylvania Department of Education
to be posted on the District web site.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LYDIA GASKIN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
NO. 94-CV-4048 (E.D.Pa.)
COMMONWEALTH OF
(JUDGE ROBRENO)
PENNSYLVANIA,
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,
et al.,
Defendants.
NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT
TO:
The parents of all students who are eligible for special
education and who have been
denied the opportunity to receive a free appropriate education in regular
classrooms with individualized supportive services OR have been placed in
regular
education classrooms without the supportive services, individualized
instruction and
accommodations they need to succeed in the regular classroom.
This Notice describes a proposed Settlement Agreement between students with
disabilities and the Pennsylvania Department of Education and all other
defendants.
This Notice tells you what the parties have agreed to do, how
to get more information, and how to object to the proposed Settlement
Agreement if you think it is not fair.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
1. This case was filed on June 30, 1994
by twelve students with disabilities and
eleven disability organizations, collectively known as the plaintiffs,
against officials of the
Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) and the State Board of
Education. The plaintiffs’
claims arose under the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA) and
related federal statutes. The
plaintiffs alleged that PDE had failed to assure that students with
disabilities are included in
regular education classroom to the maximum extent appropriate and that
students receive
appropriate supplementary aids and services in regular classrooms. The
settlement obligates
PDE to undertake a series of reforms of its systems for exercising
general supervision over
special education throughout Pennsylvania. The goal of those reforms is
that local school
districts increase their capacity to provide the supplementary aids and
services in regular
education classrooms that students with disabilities need to receive a
meaningful benefit from
education. The parties have agreed to the following undertakings:
1. PDE policies will require IEP teams to consider, and
school districts to provide,
the full range of supplementary aids and services in regular classrooms
to all students with
disabilities, including those with significant disabilities, who can
benefit from education in
regular education classes with such services.
2. PDE will establish the Special Education Bureau
Director’s Advisory Panel on
Least Restrictive Environment (“Panel”) to review system wide progress in
the delivery of
individualized specially designed instruction in regular education
classrooms, to report on the
status of implementation of this agreement and advise PDE on
implementation. Nine of the
Panel’s 15 members will be parents of children with disabilities; twelve
will be selected by the
organizational plaintiffs in this case.
3. PDE will modify its IEP format to assure that IEP
teams consider the provision
of supplementary aids and services in regular education classes before
removing students from
the regular education environment.
4. PDE will conduct a new form of compliance monitoring
called LRE monitoring,
in which PDE will identify the school districts most in need of systemic
LRE-related changes,
provide appropriate intervention to bring about those changes, and
exercise continued oversight,
including sanctions if needed, to determine whether intervention is
effective. Each year, school
districts will be assigned a data-based LRE Index Score according to
which the districts will be
identified for intervention. These scores will be included in publicly
available school district
report cards. In the districts most in need of intervention, PDE will
examine a representative
sample of Individualized Education Programs to determine whether the
district is satisfying its
obligation to provide a free, appropriate public education in the least
restrictive environment.
PDE will require specific staff training for district personnel to target
the particular violations
found.
5. PDE will investigate all complaints submitted by a parent
or student, without
exception, and each time a violation of a student’s right to receive
supplementary aids and
services in a regular education classroom is identified in a complaint
resolution or due process
hearing, will monitor whether the school district has corrected the
violation for all similarly
situated students.
6. PDE will synchronize the special education planning cycle
with its compliance
monitoring cycle and will require school districts’ special education
plans to include
appropriate corrective action when monitoring finds a failure to provide
meaningful educational
benefit to students with disabilities in regular education classes and
neighborhood schools.
7. PDE will provide on-site training and technical assistance
to school districts to
build capacity in the provision of supplementary aids and services in
regular education
classrooms. Training and technical assistance will be based on a needs
assessment to identify
the assistance needed to implement research-based practices.
8. PDE will support a grant proposal submitted by the
plaintiffs to an external
funding source to support advocacy and advocacy training on issues
relating to the provision of
supplementary aids and services in regular education classrooms.
9. PDE will provide a total of $350,000 to the individual
plaintiffs to resolve their
claims for compensatory education and other relief. PDE will pay the
plaintiffs’ counsel the
sum of $1,825,000 for attorney fees and costs.
10. The Settlement Agreement will be enforceable for five
years from the date of its
approval by the Court. Throughout the life of the agreement, PDE will
send regular written
certifications concerning its compliance with the agreement. The parties
will seek to resolve
disputes by informal means and mediation before petitioning the Court for
enforcement.
HOW TO OBJECT TO THIS SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT IF YOU THINK IT IS UNFAIR
If you do not want to object to this proposed Settlement Agreement, it
is not
necessary for you to take any action. If, however, you want to
comment on the proposed
Settlement Agreement or object to it as not being fair, you or your
attorney on your behalf may
file written comments or objections on or before _________, 2005. Written
comments and
objections should be submitted to the Court at this address: Office of
the Clerk, United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 601 Market St.,
Philadelphia, PA 19106.
You should send a copy of your comments to one of the attorneys for each
party at the
addresses contained below.
HOW TO OBTAIN MORE INFORMATION
You can get a complete copy of the proposed Settlement Agreement by
writing to
Plaintiffs’ attorneys. You may also examine the Court papers filed in
this case, which can be
viewed at the Office of the Clerk for the United States District Court in
Philadelphia. If you
have any questions or would like more information about this Notice, you
may contact your
own lawyer or the lawyers for the class.
FOR THE PENNSYLVANIA
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Lawrence White
Chief Counsel
333 Market Street, 9th Floor
Harrisburg, PA 17126-0333
FOR THE PLAINTIFF CLASS:
Judith A. Gran
Public Interest Law Center
of Philadelphia
125 S. 9th Street, Suite 700
Philadelphia, PA 19107